Home › Disposable › Article
Blu Menthol vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
Blu Menthol
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Blu Menthol and FLUM UT BAR 6000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. They look evenly matched on the key specs. FLUM UT BAR 6000 offers USB-C charging, while Blu Menthol uses a different port.
Specifications
| Spec | Blu Menthol | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | — | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | — | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | — | Mesh Coil |
| Compatibility | Blu Device Kit | — |
| E Liquid | 1.5mL | — |
| Formulation | Nicotine Salts | — |
| Nicotine Strength | — | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | — | Draw-Activated |
| Pod Material | PCTG | — |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 10mL |
| Puffs | — | 6000 |
| Subcategory | Disposable Pods | — |
Pros & Cons
Blu Menthol Pros
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Depends on preferences |
|---|---|
| Charging | FLUM UT BAR 6000 offers USB-C charging, while Blu Menthol uses a different port. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
It’s very close — choose based on charging preference, price, or flavor availability.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Kanger SUBOX Mate D- 50K Kit
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
- Blu Menthol vs OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs ELF VPR 12000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Foger Switch Pro 30K KIT
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs North FT12000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/