Home › Disposable › Article
Firerose IN7500 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Firerose IN7500
Firerose IN7500
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Firerose IN7500 and FLUM UT BAR 6000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Firerose IN7500 delivers more puffs (7500 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $9.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Firerose IN7500 | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Bottom-Airflow | — |
| Battery Capacity | 550mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | LED | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 16mL | 10mL |
| Puffs | 7500 | 6000 |
Pros & Cons
Firerose IN7500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Firerose IN7500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $9.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Firerose IN7500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- VOZOL Gear 10000 vs Firerose IN7500
- JUUL Menthol vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- RODMAN 9100 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Flum Pebble 6000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- RAZ TN9000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Firerose IN7500 vs ELF VPR 30K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/