Home › Disposable › Article
Firerose IN7500 vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
Similarity: 0%Edge: Firerose IN7500

Firerose IN7500

OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
Firerose IN7500 and OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Firerose IN7500 delivers more puffs (7500 vs 35000). OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K includes a bigger battery (900mAh vs 550mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $21.99).
Specifications
Spec | Firerose IN7500 | OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K |
---|---|---|
Airflow | Bottom-Airflow | Adjustable |
Battery Capacity | 550mAh | 900mAh |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual Mesh Coils |
Display Screen | LED | Mega Display Screen |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | Low | Regular | Strong |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 16mL | — |
Puffs | 7500 | 35000 |
Pros & Cons
Firerose IN7500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Firerose IN7500 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $21.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Firerose IN7500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Firerose IN7500 vs Yovo Ultra 18000
- Firerose IN7500 vs SOFI SURGE 25000
- LUME SS25000 vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
- Firerose IN7500 vs RAZ TN9000 0% Zero Nicotine
- Firerose IN7500 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Firerose IN7500 vs Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/