Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM Mello 20000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
FLUM Mello 20000
SWFT Meta 30000
FLUM Mello 20000 and SWFT Meta 30000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. They look evenly matched on the key specs. SWFT Meta 30000 offers USB-C charging, while FLUM Mello 20000 uses a different port.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM Mello 20000 | SWFT Meta 30000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Adjustable |
| Battery Capacity | — | 800mAh |
| Charging Port | — | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | — | Dual-Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | — | Smart Digital Display |
| Nicotine Strength | — | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | — | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 24mL |
| Puffs | — | 30,000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM Mello 20000 Pros
SWFT Meta 30000 Pros
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Depends on preferences |
|---|---|
| Charging | SWFT Meta 30000 offers USB-C charging, while FLUM Mello 20000 uses a different port. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
It’s very close — choose based on charging preference, price, or flavor availability.
Related comparisons
- 7 Daze Clickmate 15000 Kit vs FLUM Mello 20000
- SWFT Meta 30000 vs Boulder Diamond Bar 51K
- FLUM Mello 20000 vs BLURRBAR Galaxy Edition 40K
- FLUM Mello 20000 vs Kanger SUBOX 50000
- FLUM Mello 20000 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Geek Bar Pulse 15000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/