Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Lucid Boost 20123
Similarity: 0%Edge: Lucid Boost 20123
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Lucid Boost 20123
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Lucid Boost 20123 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Lucid Boost 20123 delivers more puffs (20,123 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). Both support USB-C charging. Lucid Boost 20123 is more affordable ($14.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Lucid Boost 20123 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | — | Dual-Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | 2.5" LED Display Screen |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 18mL |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 20,123 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- USB-C charging
Lucid Boost 20123 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Lucid Boost 20123 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Lucid Boost 20123 is more affordable ($14.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Lucid Boost 20123 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Blu Rich Tobacco vs Lucid Boost 20123
- TRON BAR 12K vs Lucid Boost 20123
- SPACEMAN 10K PRO vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Ronaldinho 10 15K vs Lucid Boost 20123
- Lost Vape Movement LV18000 vs Lucid Boost 20123
- BLANK BAR 15K vs Lucid Boost 20123
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/