Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs RAZ TN9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: RAZ TN9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K
RAZ TN9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K and RAZ TN9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. RAZ TN9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 650mAh). Both support USB-C charging. RAZ TN9000 is more affordable ($16.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | RAZ TN9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 650mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activation |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 12mL |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
RAZ TN9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | RAZ TN9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | RAZ TN9000 is more affordable ($16.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, RAZ TN9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs FOGER BIT 35K
- RAZ TN9000 vs Off-Stamp Classic Cube 25K
- Juice Head 30K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- RAZ TN9000 vs Cookies 30K
- RAZ RYL Classic 35K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- RAZ TN9000 vs Luff Bar FLARE 40K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/