Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs RODMAN 9100
Similarity: 0%Edge: RODMAN 9100

FLUM UT Bar 50K

RODMAN 9100
FLUM UT Bar 50K and RODMAN 9100 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. RODMAN 9100 delivers more puffs (9100 Puffs vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). Both support USB-C charging. RODMAN 9100 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | RODMAN 9100 |
---|---|---|
Airflow | Adjustable Switch | Adjustable |
Battery Capacity | 760mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | — | Prefilled Capacity |
Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 9100 Puffs |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- USB-C charging
RODMAN 9100 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | RODMAN 9100 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | RODMAN 9100 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, RODMAN 9100 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- RODMAN 9100 vs Airfuze ADDON 40000
- Vuse Alto Golden Tobacco vs RODMAN 9100
- Adjust MySweet 40K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- RODMAN 9100 vs UWELL VISCORE C30000
- RODMAN 9100 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- VOZOL Gear 10000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/