Home › Disposable › Article

FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless

Similarity: 50%Edge: Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless

FLUM UT Bar 50K and Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless delivers more puffs (50,000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 750mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless is more affordable ($18.99 vs $19.99).

Specifications

SpecFLUM UT Bar 50KSikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless
AirflowAdjustable SwitchAdjustable Airflow
Battery Capacity760mAh750mAh
Charging PortUSB Type-CUSB-C Port
Coil Type—Dual Mesh Coils
Dimensions—97.3mm by 53.1mm by 28mm
Display ScreenDigital DisplayMobius Strip Display
Nicotine Strength5% (50mg)50mg (Vapor Mode) | 20mg (Vaporless Mode)
OperationDraw-ActivatedDraw-Activated
Prefilled Capacity—23mL (18mL + 5mL)
Puffs50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)50,000

Pros & Cons

FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros

  • Bigger battery
  • USB-C charging

Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless Pros

  • Higher puff rating

Headline comparison chart

Highlights

Best pickSikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless
ChargingBoth support USB-C charging.
PriceSikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless is more affordable ($18.99 vs $19.99).

Which should you buy?

Looking at overall performance and value, Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.

Related comparisons

All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/