Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000

FLUM UT Bar 50K

Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 650mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 is more affordable ($5.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 |
---|---|---|
Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 650mAh |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
Coil Type | — | 1.0ohm Mesh Coil (10.5-16W) |
Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | — | 12.5mL |
Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 is more affordable ($5.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- RODMAN 9100 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Monster Vape Labs x KONG 50K Squonk vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 vs Airmez Mars 20K
- Memers XSORB C30000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 vs Off-Stamp Sweet Cube 25K
- Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 vs Lost Mary MO20000 Pro
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/