Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Lucid Boost 20123
Similarity: 0%Edge: Lucid Boost 20123
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Lucid Boost 20123
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Lucid Boost 20123 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Lucid Boost 20123 delivers more puffs (20,123 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $14.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Lucid Boost 20123 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual-Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | — | 2.5" LED Display Screen |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 18mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 20,123 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Lucid Boost 20123 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Lucid Boost 20123 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $14.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Lucid Boost 20123 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs HOPO x Alphaa Hookah DTL 50K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs VIHO Supercharge Pro 20K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Sigelei Smart AC10000 0% Zero Nicotine
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs Snowplus DASH 4000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs iJoy Uranus 25000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Memers Wukong V40000 Ice & Nic Adjustable
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/