Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs LUFFBAR TT9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: LUFFBAR TT9000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
LUFFBAR TT9000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and LUFFBAR TT9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. LUFFBAR TT9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | LUFFBAR TT9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual Mesh Coil |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 18mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
LUFFBAR TT9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | LUFFBAR TT9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, LUFFBAR TT9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- LUFFBAR TT9000 vs Geek Bar Digiflavor BRK Battery
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs ARRO Ultra 15K 0% Zero Nicotine
- Pyne 8500 Clear vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- LUFFBAR TT9000 vs Fumi x Cloud Nurdz 55K
- Kros Nano 5000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs OXBAR x Juice Magic Maze 2.0 30K 0% Zero Nicotine
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/