Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit
Similarity: 0%Edge: Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit

FLUM UT BAR 6000

Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit delivers more puffs (16,000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $13.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit |
---|---|---|
Airflow | — | Fixed |
Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 1000mAh (Combined) | 200mAh (Pod) | 800mAh (Charging Station) |
Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C (Battery Backpack Only) |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | — |
Display Screen | — | LED |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 17mL |
Puffs | 6000 | 16,000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $13.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
- RELX Crystal 15K vs Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs OXBAR x Juice NIC SWITCH 35K
- RAZ CA6000 6000 vs Off-Stamp SW16000 Kit
- Lost Vape Orion Bar Young P15 6000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Memers XSORB ME25K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/