Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit
Similarity: 0%Edge: Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit delivers more puffs (9000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 1000mAh (Combined) | 200mAh (Pod) | 800mAh (Charging Station) |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | — |
| Display Screen | — | LED |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 13mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- SOFI X9000 Smart vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit vs Airmez Matrix 25K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit vs Off-Stamp X-Cube Crystal 35K Kit
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Memers Wukong V40000 Ice & Nic Adjustable
- 7 Daze EGGE 3000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/