Home › Disposable › Article

FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco

Similarity: 0%Edge: OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco
FLUM UT BAR 6000
OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco

FLUM UT BAR 6000 and OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco are two disposable options competing head-to-head. OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco delivers more puffs (25,000 (Boost Mode) | 50,000 (ECO Mode) vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $24.99).

Specifications

SpecFLUM UT BAR 6000OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco
AirflowAdjustable
Battery CapacityIntegrated Rechargeable900mAh
Charging PortType-C PortUSB Type-C
Coil TypeMesh CoilUNIONE Triple Mesh Coil
Display Screen3D Curved Screen
Nicotine Strength5% (50mg)5%
OperationDraw-ActivatedDraw-Activated
Prefilled Capacity10mL
Puffs600025,000 (Boost Mode) | 50,000 (ECO Mode)

Pros & Cons

FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros

    OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco Pros

    • Higher puff rating
    • USB-C charging

    Headline comparison chart

    Highlights

    Best pickOXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco
    ChargingBoth support USB-C charging.
    PriceFLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $24.99).

    Which should you buy?

    Looking at overall performance and value, OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.

    Related comparisons

    All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/