Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs RODMAN 9100
Similarity: 0%Edge: RODMAN 9100
FLUM UT BAR 6000
RODMAN 9100
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and RODMAN 9100 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. RODMAN 9100 delivers more puffs (9100 Puffs vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | RODMAN 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Adjustable |
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | Prefilled Capacity |
| Puffs | 6000 | 9100 Puffs |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
RODMAN 9100 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | RODMAN 9100 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, RODMAN 9100 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- RODMAN 9100 vs CB15K x Chris Brown
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Yovo Starwalk 40K
- RODMAN 9100 vs Pica Bar Tuning 30K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Pyne CLICK 40K
- VIHO Turbo 10000 vs RODMAN 9100
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs CZAR X CX15000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/