Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs SMOK Novo Bar AL6000
Similarity: 100%
FLUM UT BAR 6000
SMOK Novo Bar AL6000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. They look evenly matched on the key specs. Both support USB-C charging.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Bottom Switch |
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 650mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C Port |
| Chipset | — | DCOIL-AI6.0 |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Mesh Coils |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 13mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 6000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Depends on preferences |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
It’s very close — choose based on charging preference, price, or flavor availability.
Related comparisons
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs Firerose UPLOAD 25K
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs HQD Cuvie X 25000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Pyne CLICK 40K
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs Lost Vape Lightrise TB 18K
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs Kros Wireless 9000
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs Pillow Talk 8500
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/