Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Snowplus DASH 4000
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT BAR 6000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Snowplus DASH 4000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Snowplus DASH 4000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT BAR 6000 delivers more puffs (6000 vs 4000). FLUM UT BAR 6000 offers USB-C charging for faster top-ups, while Snowplus DASH 4000 uses a different port.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Snowplus DASH 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Fixed |
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 530mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | — |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Ceramic |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 3% |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 7.5mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 4000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Snowplus DASH 4000 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | FLUM UT BAR 6000 offers USB-C charging for faster top-ups, while Snowplus DASH 4000 uses a different port. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT BAR 6000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- LUFFBAR TT9000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Metaku Spongie 7500 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Juice Head 30K vs Snowplus DASH 4000
- Snowplus DASH 4000 vs AAOK Dual Flavors 110K
- So Soul Nola Bar 10000 vs Snowplus DASH 4000
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/