Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
Similarity: 0%Edge: SWFT Meta 30000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
SWFT Meta 30000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and SWFT Meta 30000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. SWFT Meta 30000 delivers more puffs (30,000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | SWFT Meta 30000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Adjustable |
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 800mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual-Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | — | Smart Digital Display |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 24mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 30,000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
SWFT Meta 30000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | SWFT Meta 30000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, SWFT Meta 30000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Nasty Bar DX8.5i 8500 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- VUSE ALTO Dusk Glow Tobacco vs SWFT Meta 30000
- 7 Daze OHMLET 7000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs UPENDS Mirror Pro 12000
- SWFT Meta 30000 vs Ploox X 15000
- Modus x KadoBar KB10000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/