Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Yovo Ultra 18000
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT BAR 6000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Yovo Ultra 18000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Yovo Ultra 18000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT BAR 6000 delivers more puffs (6000 vs 18000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Yovo Ultra 18000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 850mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | — | Digital Display |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 15mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 18000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Yovo Ultra 18000 Pros
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT BAR 6000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Yovo Ultra 18000 vs Feed Sync 30K
- Metaku Moonwalk 9000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs ARRO Ultra X 40K 0% Zero Nicotine
- Yovo Ultra 18000 vs Pyne CLICK 40K
- Yovo Ultra 18000 vs BLURRBAR Galaxy Edition 40K
- PICA BAR Super Pro 30K vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/