Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs Lucid Boost 20123
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
Lucid Boost 20123
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 and Lucid Boost 20123 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 delivers more puffs (25000 (25K) vs 20,123). Both support USB-C charging. Lucid Boost 20123 is more affordable ($14.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 | Lucid Boost 20123 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Dual-Mesh Coils | Dual-Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | LED | 2.5" LED Display Screen |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 15.5mL | 18mL |
| Puffs | 25000 (25K) | 20,123 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Lucid Boost 20123 Pros
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Lucid Boost 20123 is more affordable ($14.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Spaceman Nebula 25K Plus vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Blu Tobacco Ice vs Lucid Boost 20123
- Pillow Talk Nic Control NC40K Tobacco vs Lucid Boost 20123
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs Airmez XBEATS 40K
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs PAC Bar 30K Tobacco
- Flum Pebble X 6000 vs Lucid Boost 20123
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/