Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs Pocket 7500
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
Pocket 7500
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 and Pocket 7500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 delivers more puffs (25000 (25K) vs 7500). Both support USB-C charging. Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 | Pocket 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Dual-Mesh Coils | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | LED | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 15.5mL | 14mL |
| Puffs | 25000 (25K) | 7500 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Pocket 7500 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Pocket 7500 vs HQD Cuvie X 25000
- FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs Fumi 24K 0% Zero Nicotine
- Pocket 7500 vs Fruitia x Fifty Bar 20K
- Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- ELF VPR 7000 Ultra vs Pocket 7500
- Airis NEO P8000 vs Pocket 7500
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/