Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs Pocket 7500
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000

FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000

Pocket 7500
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 and Pocket 7500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 delivers more puffs (25000 (25K) vs 7500). Both support USB-C charging. Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 | Pocket 7500 |
---|---|---|
Battery Capacity | 760mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
Coil Type | Dual-Mesh Coils | Mesh Coil |
Display Screen | LED | — |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 15.5mL | 14mL |
Puffs | 25000 (25K) | 7500 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Pocket 7500 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Pocket 7500 vs Pica Bar Tuning 30K
- Pocket 7500 vs Posh OYO 30K
- FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs DOJO iMate X 40K Kit
- VUSE ALTO Dusk Glow Tobacco vs Pocket 7500
- FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs Rodman Playoffs 50K
- Pocket 7500 vs RAZ RYL Classic 35K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/