Home › Disposable › Article
Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K
Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K and Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 delivers more puffs ([25K] - 25000 vs 25000). Both support USB-C charging. Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K is more affordable ($14.99 vs $17.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K | Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Fixed | — |
| Battery Capacity | 850mAh | TBD |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Quad Mesh Coil | Triple Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | Color Changing Smart Screen | LED |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | TBD | TBD |
| Puffs | 25000 | [25K] - 25000 |
Pros & Cons
Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K Pros
- USB-C charging
Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K is more affordable ($14.99 vs $17.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Kros Nano 5000 vs Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K
- North 5000 vs Kangvape Onee Stick Smart TC25K
- SOFI X9000 0% Zero Nicotine Smart vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
- 7 Daze OHMLET 7000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
- Flum Pebble X 6000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/