Home › Disposable › Article
Pocket 7500 vs Pyne 8500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Pyne 8500
Pocket 7500
Pyne 8500
Pocket 7500 and Pyne 8500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Pyne 8500 delivers more puffs (8500 vs 7500). Both support USB-C charging. Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Pocket 7500 | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Mesh Coils |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 14mL | 15mL |
| Puffs | 7500 | 8500 |
Pros & Cons
Pocket 7500 Pros
Pyne 8500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Pyne 8500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Pyne 8500 vs NEXA PRO 30000
- Pocket 7500 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Pocket 7500 vs UPENDS Mirror Pro 12000
- VOZOL Gear 10000 vs Pyne 8500
- Pocket 7500 vs GYYR x Wynn Bar Challenger 30000
- Pyne 8500 vs LUFFBAR Boring Tiger 25000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/